AI-assisted clinical documentation, without the hype
AI can remove typing from a consultation. It cannot take clinical responsibility. MedFlow is built on that distinction — every AI-drafted line is reviewed by the clinician before it becomes part of the record.
Key takeaways
- AI drafts; the clinician reviews, edits and approves. Nothing files itself.
- Provenance is recorded, so it is visible which text originated from AI and what the clinician changed.
- Decision support raises flags for review — it does not issue instructions.
- AI activity is logged for clinical governance review.
What it does in a consultation
- Drafts structured notes from the consultation, organised for review
- Converts dictation into a structured note the clinician edits
- Summarises a long chart before a review appointment
- Flags abnormal trends, unacknowledged results and risk indicators
- Assists medication reconciliation and prescribing safety checks
The controls around it
- A clinician must review and approve AI-generated content before it enters the record
- Side-by-side comparison shows the AI draft against the clinician's final text
- Provenance access is restricted by role
- AI requests and recommendations are logged for audit
- Service degradation is handled gracefully — documentation never depends on the AI being available
What we do not claim
MedFlow does not diagnose, does not prescribe autonomously and is not marketed as a medical device. Decision support is assistive and always subject to clinical judgement.
MedFlow home — Contact Ubora One Limited